Pre Loader

How To Increase IQ? Three Effective IQ Boosting Technologies Reviewed

Intelligence & IQ Defined

A good cognitive science definition of general intelligence is:

 

“. . . that facet of mind underlying our capacity to think, to solve novel problems, to reason and to have knowledge of the world.”  M. Anderson

 

This op-ed statement signed by fifty-two researchers in the field (ref) extends this idea to include learning and being ‘switched on’:

 

“A very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings — catching on, making sense of things, or figuring out what to do.”

 

Intelligence is best understood as being switched on, competent, and a good learner and problem-solver – rather than being just ‘book smart’ or ‘good at math’.

 

The practical advantages of having a high IQ for cognitive capital increase as our work environments become more changeable and complex – more novel, ambiguous, unpredictable, or multifaceted.

 

IQ Increasing Technologies: A Review

IQ training to increase IQ and get smarter is a viable strategy.

This article reviews three of the most effective IQ-increasing interventions that have a firm scientific basis – a basis in experimental laboratories and the exacting standards of peer reviewed scientific journals. The methods described below are part of the accumulated understanding of the scientific community about what can increase IQ through neuroplasticity change – not just temporarily but long-term. Cognitive-enhancing nutrition, exercise and meditation are not covered in this review that focuses on the use of intervention technologies. These strategies are reviewed here.

 

1. IQ Training Software

Working Memory Cognitive Training

Far-reaching advances in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience over the past decade have identified a close link between frontal lobe ‘working memory’ circuitry, and fronto-parietal problem solving and reasoning circuitry – core elements of IQ.

Our working memory is used for holding information in mind (images, concepts, language, numbers) for brief periods while engaging in active, goal-focused thinking or comprehension, while screening out distracting information.

Working memory has a limited capacity, and the bigger that capacity the more the cognitive ‘RAM’ power a person has for processing information – to make connections, generate alternatives, and grasp relationships. This brainpower lies at the core of being smart.

Dual N-Back

 

IQ training software has now been developed for selectively targeting working memory circuitry, resulting in long term neuroplasticity changes increasing short term memory capacity, problem solving ability, self-control and overall IQ. This software is based on a training exercise called the dual n-back.

A review on the effectiveness of working memory (n-back) training concludes:

 

“core working memory training produces far-reaching transfer effects…because it targets domain-general mechanisms of working memory. The results of studies encourage optimism regarding the value of working memory training as a tool for general cognitive enhancement.”

 

 

The latest meta-analyses (ref1, ref2, ref3), of all published results on the effectiveness of dual n-back training conclude that there are significant, placebo-controlled, training effect improving working memory (Gwm) and fluid intelligence (Gf). The greatest effect is on working memory itself (which is a subfactor of IQ measured by full-scale IQ tests) – but training also has a direct impact on fluid intelligence (reasoning in novel situations).

 

Fluid Inteligence Gains from Dual N-Back Meta-Analysis

 

Attention-Based Cognitive Training

In choosing an n-back working memory training application, ensure that you have a version the incorporates attention training – also called executive control training – in addition to working memory training. Combining dual n-back training with attention control training (sometimes called ‘multi-modal training) is more effective than cognitive training alone, particularly if it is also combined with aerobic exercise. Here is a very recent study showing impressive effect sizes for cognitive training with fitness training 

The ‘cognitive training’ used in this study combined working memory (n-back) with attention control training.

 

 

Another type of attention-based cognitive training is interference control training.

Research (article 1article 2) shows that interference control underlies the link between working capacity and fluid intelligence.  Interference control is he ability to filter out distracting information that attracts your attention. N-back training apps on the market do not generally incorporate this feature.

 

interference control

 

The evidence-based cognitive training app i3 Mindware is explicitly designed to have different interference control settings to increase IQ gains.   i3 Mindware has also been designed to incorporate attention control training through working memory attention gating.

 

2. Nootropics (‘Smart Drugs’)

The issue of using medication for cognitive enhancement is highly controversial, but the ethics of smart drugs is not discussed in this article.

Nootropics – also known as smart drugs, memory enhancers, cognitive enhancers and intelligence enhancers – are drugs, supplements, nutraceuticals (a product isolated or purified from foods) that are designed to improve cognitive functions such as memory, attention and intelligence.

In 2008 the science journal Nature launched an informal survey into readers’ use of cognition-enhancing drugs, and found large-scale use among academics.  One in five respondents said they had used drugs for non-medical reasons to stimulate their focus, concentration or memory.

 

In 2008 the scientific journal Nature ran a commentary on this topic entitled Towards responsible use of cognitive enhancing drugs by the healthy. The authors outline the evidence in favor of the effectiveness of ‘smart drugs’ and I will quote at length from the section “Paths to Enhancement” which reviews the nootropics known to enhance brain function:

 

 

 

Ritalin and Adderall

Many of the medications used to treat psychiatric and neurological conditions also improve the performance of the healthy. The drugs most commonly used for cognitive enhancement at present are stimulants, namely Ritalin (methyphenidate) and Adderall (mixed amphetamine salts), and are prescribed mainly for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because of their effects on the catecholamine system, these drugs increase executive functions in patients and most healthy normal people, improving their abilities to focus their attention, manipulate information in working memory and flexibly control their responses.

 

Modafinil

A newer drug, Modafinil (Provigil), has also shown enhancement potential. Modafinil is approved for the treatment of fatigue caused by narcolepsy, sleep apnoea and shift-work sleep disorder. It is currently prescribed off label for a wide range of neuropsychiatric and other medical conditions involving fatigue as well as for healthy people who need to stay alert and awake when sleep deprived, such as physicians on night call. In addition, laboratory studies have shown that modafinil enhances aspects of executive function in rested healthy adults, particularly inhibitory control. Unlike Adderall and Ritalin, however, Modafinil prescriptions are not common, and the drug is consequently rare on the college black market. But anecdotal evidence and a readers’ survey both suggest that adults sometimes obtain modafinil from their physicians or online for enhancement purposes.

 

Aricept

A modest degree of memory enhancement is possible with the ADHD medications just mentioned as well as with medications developed for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease such as Aricept (donepezil), which raise levels of acetylcholine in the brain. Several other compounds with different pharmacological actions are in early clinical trials, having shown positive effects on memory in healthy research subjects.

 

The authors focus at length on the potential risks and ethical concerns of using nootropic cognitive enhancers, but conclude:

 

Like all new technologies, cognitive enhancement can be used well or poorly. We should welcome new methods of improving our brain function. In a world in which human workspans and lifespans are increasing, cognitive enhancement tools — including the pharmacological — will be increasingly useful for improved quality of life and extended work productivity, as well as to stave off normal and pathological age related cognitive declines. Safe and effective cognitive enhancers will benefit both the individual and society.

 

3. Cortical Stimulation – tDCS

A number of studies in the last few years have shown very promising results from applying electrical current to the brain using a technology known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a noninvasive technique in which a weak current is applied to the brain constantly over time to excite or inhibit the activity of neurons.

 

In late 2010, a group of researchers from University College London and Oxford University published a study showing that tDCS applied to the parietal lobes enhanced a person’s mathematical ability selectively, without influencing other cognitive functions. The improvement was found to have persisted six months after the training, showing the IQ gain was long-lasting.

Following this a study published in Clinical Neurophysiology showed that tDCS of a the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) improves working memory functioning. The dlPFC is a region in the frontal lobes toward the top and side: hence dorso (top) and lateral (side). The researchers report that there was significant improvement in speed of performance following  tDCS on an n-back working memory task.

 

In another study published recently, a team at Centre for the Mind at the University of Sydney demonstrated that tDCS can dramatically improve insight problem solving. Three times as many cortically stimulated individuals succeeded in solving puzzles needing creative insight. People find it difficult to think outside of the box because their problem solving ‘mind set’ becomes crystallized by habits. By inhibiting the activity of the left temporal lobe, and stimulating activity in the right temporal lobe, this team changed the balance between the two hemispheres of the brain, leading to better release from mental sets and better creative insight. One of the team, Professor Snyder, believes brain boosting headgear could be widely used.

 

“The thinking cap of the future is not one that helps us to remember facts as the internet has solved that problem, but one that facilitates learning and unlearning mindsets. It’s all about being original.”

Professor Snyder

 

Some of the most recent work on tDCS was presented in September this year by Professor Prof Heidi Johansen-Berg and her colleagues at Oxford University. They found that just ten minutes of motor cortex brain stimulation increases the speed of learning motor skills. In their study a musical keyboard sequence was the learning task.

 

“While the stimulation didn’t improve the participant’s best performance, the speed at which they reached their best was significantly increased.” Professor Johansen-Berg

 

The researchers envisage the technique could be used to help in the training of athletes and suggest that the same method could be applied to other parts of the brain (such as the frontal or parietal cortex) to improve educational learning simply by positioning the electrodes in different locations so the current is focused on the correct area.

The potential for self-experimentation is exciting. As this BBC report on cortical stimulation states:

 

“The relative simplicity, low price (around £2,000 per unit), and portability of the technology may mean that, following further research, a device could be designed to be automated for use at home.”

 

Non-Supporting Studies

Despite the excitement about the potential of tDCS for cognitive enhancement, more studies are needed. A recent 2015 randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study looking directly at tDCS applied to the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) reported a reduction in IQ test performance compared to the non-tDCS control group – particularly for matrix reasoning tests. There are different tDCS methods and it’s important to look at the pattern of results from multiple studies.

What is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn is a systematic meta-analysis of all relevant studies. This has in fact been done with single session tDCS in this 2015 meta-analysis, which concludes:

 

“There appears to be no reliable effect of tDCS on executive function, language, memory, or miscellaneous measures. Single-session tDCS does not appear to generate reliable cognitive effect in healthy populations.”

 

So either there is need for more specificity in tDCS techniques for single sessions to be effective, or effectiveness depends on multiple tDCS sessions.

Either way, unlike working memory brain training and nootropics, tDCS is not firmly established as an effective cognitive intervention.

 

Summary : Get Smarter

One of my research areas is IQ training and methods for how to increase IQ. In this article I have reviewed technologies that – applied appropriately – have been shown to have a substantial IQ increasing effect by the exacting standards of peer reviewed scientific research. The most effective technologies directly target working memory and attention control (combined with exercise).

IQ augmentation is a cultural enterprise that is gaining momentum, but the technologies reviewed above take us into largely unexplored territory. It is our privilege to be in an era of both imaginative brain science and responsible self-experimentation to spearhead mapping out this territory.

 

I am a cognitive scientist specializing in health, resilience and performance (HRP) brain training interventions and self-quantification. I have a joint Ph.D in cognitive psychology and neuroscience from the Center of the Neural Basis of Cognition (Carnegie Mellon/Pittsburgh) and for a number of years was a researcher and lecturer at Cambridge University.

7 Comments

  • Mark– One of my sons has Asperger’s and recently showed a 20+ point loss of IQ. I know he is sensitive to video games. I found that after about 2 days of playing “Snood,” my results on a (very rushed) internet IQ test show a similar degree of loss. I have no worry that anything permanent has been lost. But I’d like to draw your attention to the near-opposite configuration of the rules of what is important and how to respond in Snood vs on a “comparative shapes” IQ test.

    I think if you really push on the problem, you may be able to explain WHY time stress and sleep deficits affect specific areas of judgment, and ways in which attention deficits may be adaptive despite the general presumption they are maladaptive.

    Let me know if you’d like more details.

    Jim Simon 18.11.2014
  • Have you done research of people with dyslexia and also increased their IQ?

    simone templeton 07.03.2015
    • Sorry no dedicated research with dyslexia although I know Tracy Alloway has reviewed benefits of working memory training for dyslexia.

      Mark A. Smith, Ph.D 11.06.2015
  • Have you conducted any research on individuals that has surpassed 200 or 300 sessions of N-Back training? More specifically, will there be continued improvement in working memory and iq, with individuals that has exceeded for example 300 sessions of N-Back training.

    Pieter Greyling 22.04.2016
    • Based on analogies with long-term meditation practitioners, I would predict that there will be overall better gamma and theta wave baseline synchrony which should make information processing more efficient. But no studies have looked at this for n-back/working memory training directly yet.

      Mark A. Smith, Ph.D 25.04.2016
  • Have you done any studies on individuals with Bi Polar Disorder. My understanding is that Bi Polar disorder is very simular to ADHD.

    Ramona Naylor 02.09.2017
i3 Mindware IQ App